Jury In Art Forgery Case: Mother and Son Committed Fraud, Ordered to Repay $500K
A former Franklin Pierce University art professor and her son have been ordered to repay nearly $500,000 for selling forged paintings by the artist Leon Golub.
After two hours of deliberation, a jury in federal court in Concord on Thursday ruled in favor of the plaintiff Andrew Hall, who brought the civil suit after discovering that 17 paintings purportedly by Golub were clever fakes. Hall bought the works from Lorettann and Nikolas Gascard of Rindge in 2011.
“Obviously I’m happy that justice was done, and it’s a relief,” said Hall, on the courthouse steps afterward. “It’s good for me, but more importantly, I think it is really good for Leon Golub and his legacy and his reputation.”
Though not a household name, Golub was a major contemporary artist in the second half of the 20th century. Hall, a prominent collector, already owned pieces by the artist, and acquired more from the Gascards through a series of transactions.
In 2015, while Hall was preparing for an exhibition of Golub paintings at his gallery in Vermont, Hall's assistants discovered the works were likely forgeries.
Lorettann Gascard was a student of Golub in the late 1960s, and claims to have remained a lifelong friend. Nikolas Gascard informed Hall during the transaction of the family’s relationship, but failed to disclose how exactly his family came to acquire so many previously unknown Golubs.
The Gascards testified that the paintings were found rolled up in a closet in Germany, where they were cleaning out a relative’s apartment after her death. After shipping the works back to New Hampshire, Nikolas Gascard admitted that he then created titles and years of creation for the paintings before selling them through auction houses Christie’s and Sotheby’s, as well as through direct sales to Hall and a collector in Australia.
Hall testified that if he had been told this version of the paintings' whereabouts, and the conjured titles, he never would have completed the transaction.
During the trial, Hall’s lawyers brought in a leading expert in the work of Golub to testify. Professor Jon Bird called the paintings “wrong,” and described how they failed to resemble authentic Golub works.
The Gascards didn’t appear to react as the court clerk read the jury’s verdict. They declined to comment, or say if they plan to appeal.
“I think someone has to keep people honest, and I think the credibility of the art market and in particular, the legacy of Leon Golub was being put at risk here,” said Hall. “Hopefully, in some ways, it’s been corrected.”