Todd Bookman
Senior ReporterAs a general assignment reporter, I pursue breaking news as well as investigative pieces across a range of topics. I’m drawn to stories that are big and timely, as well as those that may appear small but tell us something larger about the state we live in. I also love a good tip, a good character, or a story that involves a boat ride.
Todd can be reached at tbookman@nhpr.org.
-
A Massachusetts resident wanted to speak at a Board of Aldermen meeting in Nashua, but refused to say his address, citing security concerns. Now he’s suing over the city’s longstanding disclosure rules. -
The tax forgiveness program brought in far more than expected. It arrived at a crucial time for the state budget, helping to close a $47 million shortfall. -
The state terminated its annual inspections without first obtaining approval from the EPA, triggering a lawsuit and potential fines. Now, the feds say they will move quickly to rule. -
The rise of Kalshi and Polymarket, which offer bettors an alternative to wagering sites like DraftKings, means more competition and possibly less into state coffers. -
The court ruled cell phone location data for defendant Logan Clegg was obtained without a warrant, violating the state constitution. A lower court will now consider other factors in the case. -
Dean Kamen founded the youth-focused science initiative in 1989 to inspire a new generation of inventors. He has not been accused of any criminal wrongdoing. -
New Hampshire towns held local elections Tuesday. In addition to municipal budgets, voters had thoughts about Iran, the price of gas, and lots more. -
Dr. Michael Lewis has spent the past six years as provost at Saint Louis University in Missouri. He’s taking over leadership at Saint Anselm at a time of strength, he says. -
Voters go to the polls Tuesday for New Hampshire town meetings. Here’s what you need to know about voter identification and voter registration for town elections. -
Backers of an investigation say an inquiry into the chief justice is necessary to restore confidence in the courts. Opponents question its underlying evidence.
