Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Make a sustaining gift today to support local journalism!
What Is Northern Pass? Northern Pass is a proposal to run 192 miles of new power lines from Canada, through northern New Hampshire, south to Concord, and then eastward to Deerfield. The project is a collaboration between Eversource (previously known as Public Service of New Hampshire) and Hydro-Quebec, which is owned by the provincial government of Quebec. The utilities say the $1.6 billion Northern Pass project would transport 1,090 megawatts of electricity from Quebec – which derives more than 90 percent of its power from hydroelectric dams – to the New England power grid.The ControversyNorthern Pass has proved an incredibly controversial issue in New Hampshire, especially in the North CountryThe project has generated considerable controversy from the beginning. Despite its statewide impacts, many of the projects most dedicated opponents come from the sparsely-populated and heavily forested North Country.Eversource says the new lines would bring jobs and tax revenue to this struggling part of the state. But opponents of the project say it would mean only temporary jobs for residents when it's under construction. They also say it will deface New Hampshire's forestland, hurting tourism and lowering property values. Depending on the location, developers say the project's towers will range from 85 to 135 feet tall.Polls have consistently found the public remains sharply divided on this issue.Some critics have pushed for the entire project to be buried. Politicians ranging from Sen. Maggie Hassan to former Sen. Kelly Ayotte to 2012 GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich have floated this move as having the potential to soften opposition. Eversource maintains this would be too expensive, and would effectively make the project impossible to pursue. The Route: Real Estate Chess Plays Out In The North Country Northern Pass and its opponents have been fighting over control of land along potential routesNorthern Pass has considered a number of routes for the project, but has publicly announced three. The first, unveiled in 2011, faced major backlash from North Country residents and environmental groups. Over the next couple of years, the project and its primary opponent the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests played a prolonged chess match over parcels of North Country land. Northern Pass ultimately spent more than $40 million purchasing acres of undeveloped land in the North Country. Meanwhile, the Forest Society undertook an aggressive fundraising campaign and sought a slew of conservation easements to block potential routes.This maneuvering narrowed the options for Northern Pass. One lingering possibility was exercising eminent domain. Northern Pass publicly stated it was not interested in pursuing eminent domain. But in 2012, in response to strong statewide opposition, the Legislature closed the option altogether, outlawing the practice except in cases where a new transmission line was needed to maintain the reliability of the electric system.By the spring of 2013, Northern Pass opponents believed the project was essentially "cornered" into trying to route the power line through a large conservation easement, called the Connecticut Lakes Headwaters. The governor at that time, Democrat Maggie Hassan, said she opposed such a move on the part of Northern Pass.Second Time Around: Northern Pass Announces Alternative RouteIn June of 2013, Northern Pass unveiled its second proposed route. Abandoning its previous strategy (and $40 million in land purchases) altogether, the project proposed building along existing state and local North Country roadways in Clarksville and Stewartstown. In a nod to project opponents, Northern Pass also said it will bury 7.5 miles of line in Stewartstown, Clarksville, and under the Connecticut River. That raised the price tag on the project from $1.2 billion as initially proposed to about $1.4 billion. While opponents said this move was progress, many – including the Forest Society – maintained that Northern Pass should be able to bury all 180 miles of power lines.Final Route: Burial through the White Mountains0000017a-15d9-d736-a57f-17ff8a620000 After years of continued opposition, Northern Pass made its final concession to critics. It downsized the powerline from an initial proposal of 1,200 megawatts to 1,090 to take advantage of a new technology, known as HVDC lite. This move made it more economical to bury portions of the line, and Eversource said it was now willing to bury 52 additional miles of the project. The new route would be alongside state roadways as the project passed through the White Mountain National Forest.While the governor called the change “an important improvement,” she also said “further improvements” to the project should be made. The partial burial did not placate the project’s fiercest opponents, but some speculated that it would help the project clear one significant hurdle: whether it would get approval to use public lands from the top official at the White Mountain National Forest. The move pushed the estimated price tag up again, to $1.6 billion, now for a project that would deliver less power.With its new route in hand, project officials filed to build the project in October of 2015.Before the Site Evaluation CommitteeThe application to state officials was likely the longest and most complicated in the state’s history, and 161 individuals, interest groups, and municipalities asked to be allowed to participate in the process to evaluate the merits of the project.Given the size and complexity of the project, many of the interveners pushed for a longer review than the standard one year that state law dictates. In May of 2016, those groups got their wish, and the decision was pushed back 9 months. The final deadline was set for September of 2017. However, once the proceeding got under way, it was clear that even this delay would not allow time to hear from all of the witnesses called by the various interveners. Early in September of 2017 it was delayed again, with a final decision set for February 2018.DeniedOn February 1st, 2018, the New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee voted unanimously to deny the permit for Northern Pass, a decision that triggered an appeals process that was taken up by the New Hampshire Supreme Court in late 2018.In May of 2019, the court heard orgal arguments on the appeal.On July 19, 2019, the court issued its ruling. In a unanimous decision, the SEC's rejection of the project was upheld, likely marking the end of Northern Pass as it was proposed.

Saying "No" To Northern Pass - And Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars

The Northern Pass electric project is searching for a new, less controversial path through the North Country.

But a small group of landowners is determined to block the utility’s plan even though it means giving up hundreds of thousands of dollars.

NHPR’s Chris Jensen reports.

Sound of piano music.

At 65 years of age Lynne Placey gives piano lessons.

She lives with a cat and a gray-muzzled dog in a small house in Stewartstown.

And she hopes she’s blocking the path of a corporate giant.

“I just would feel like I was selling out.”

That corporate giant is the Northern Pass project.

It is a partnership between two companies.

One is Northeast Utilities, the parent company of Public Service of New Hampshire.

The other is NStar, a Massachusetts-based utility company.

Northern Pass wants to run a transmission linefrom the Canadian border 180 miles south carrying power from Hydro-Quebec.

The towers would be between 90 and 135 feet high. 

The first 40 miles of that will be a new cut through North-Country forests.

But North Country residents strongly opposed  the original route – which went to Groveton.

So in April Northern Pass said it would look for a new route.

Lynne Placey says a phone call convinced her that her land is part of that new route.

“He said I represent a party that would like to know if you would be interested in granting them an easement across your 114 acres up on Holden Hill. And, I said ‘Who is the party you represent?’ He said ‘Ultimately it is the Northern Pass.”

That land has been in the family for a long time. Placey says her late husband, Donald, took her there on one of their first dates.

She says she turned the realtor down without even asking about the money.

Later when a relative who owns adjacent land came to visit she got a good idea of how much money she might have gotten.

“He said ‘I have just signed a contract with Northern Pass for $500,000 for my 114 or 115 acres or whatever he had. And he said, you know, they would be willing to do the same for you. They would like to talk to you. They would like to make you an offer.”

Placey admits the money would make her life so much easier.

Her husband was sick for about a decade. That chewed up the couple’s savings. Now she gets by on Social Security and the piano lessons.

“That would be a comfortable nest egg. I wouldn’t have to wonder, you know, next year now where am I going to cut some wood so I can pay the taxes? I wouldn’t have to be so worried.”

From her house she can’t even see the land Northern Pass wanted to buy. It’s several miles away. But she hates the idea of the huge towers forever changing the land.

She says she and family members who own other parcels have all agreed they have to block Northern Pass.

"And one of the reasons I am so adamant about not selling it that it is just not about me. It is the whole North Country and this whole North Country doesn’t want to see those towers. We don’t want a foreign corporation coming in here.”

Sound of pickup truck rumbling along.

Rick Samson is driving his pickup along Cream Poke Road in Stewartstown.

He’s a strong opponent of Northern Pass.

So much so, that he checks county records to find recent land purchased by Northern Pass.

He thinks after crossing the Canadian border near Pittsburg Northern Pass will likely go southeast towards the Dixville Notch and then continue south.

“My opinion is that they have several different routes because they don’t have enough parcels for a direct route right now. So, they are buying land up so they can have as many options as they can.”

Northern Pass officials aren’t talking about their plans. They say the route is still being developed.

A few bouncy miles up the road Samson stops his pickup near the top of a ridge. There’s an old outhouse. Next to it is a sign saying “Stop Northern Pass.”

It is raining and the clouds are hunkered down onto the mountains. But the misty-gray view is still great.

Samson and I climb out of the truck and meet Bill Weir who owns the land.

“We can look right over from here pretty much into Rangely, Maine. You can look up in this direction and see Canada and look way over to the left is the top end of the state of Vermont comes up into this area.”.

Weir says Northern Pass wants to buy 18 of acres of it.

He points to the woods at the edge of a field and says if Northern Pass has its way the towers would stretch across his land just inside the tree line.

“I’ve always called this my million-dollar view. Well, if I got to look through a bunch of towers and power lines it is going to ruin my view.”

He says he just won’t sell.

“If I can possibly stop Northern Pass going across my property I will do it.”

One tactic being explored by the opponents – who often refer to themselves as “The Opposition” - is trying to buy land that the utility wants.

Again, Rick Samson:

“There’s two parcels in Clarksville and Pittsburg right now that are being negotiated for by both Northern Pass and the opposition.”

Before Northern Pass proceeds it needs the approval of state and federal officials.

But opponents of the project say they don’t have much faith in that process.

Bill Weir:

“I don’t think the state is doing a job right now. Governor Lynch, he said they are going to move the line to make the North Country people happy. Maybe they made a few happy they moved it, but they made a hell of a lot more unhappy again. The North Country people up here don’t want this line and everybody is unhappy about it.”

As Samson sees it stopping the Northern Pass may come down to a bunch of stubborn landowners who put their desire for an unchanged North Country above money.

Samson says he sympathizes with people who badly need money and feel they simply can’t turn down offers from Northern Pass.

But he is bitter about land sold by speculators and people he feels didn’t need the money.

The issue of whether to sell land is emerging as a source of friction within the North Country.

 “There are some business people in Colebrook and Stewartstown that have sold and as far as I am concerned I can no longer do business with them.”

Northern Pass has been running a series of ads trying to put a human face on the project.

“Hi, my name is Grace. I live in Franklin, New Hampshire. I have three boys that attend the schools here and I work at the recreation center here in town.”

The advertisement touts the economic benefits of the project.

“The Northern Pass is supposed to bring $25 million in revenues to the state of New Hampshire every year. We need it. The kids need it.”

But opponents of Northern Pass note that none of the people in those ads is from the North Country.

Several are from Franklin which stands to benefit from a tax boost.

The opponents say the faces people should also see belong to people like Placey and Weir.

They are the people who feel the Northern Pass will so badly damage the North Country that they’re willing to give up hundreds of thousands of dollars.

For NHPR News, this is Chris Jensen.

Related Content

You make NHPR possible.

NHPR is nonprofit and independent. We rely on readers like you to support the local, national, and international coverage on this website. Your support makes this news available to everyone.

Give today. A monthly donation of $5 makes a real difference.