© 2025 New Hampshire Public Radio

Persons with disabilities who need assistance accessing NHPR's FCC public files, please contact us at publicfile@nhpr.org.
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Own a business? Expand your reach and grow your audience by becoming an underwriter on NHPR.

Federal judge bars state from enforcing DEI ban on most school districts

U.S. District Court in Concord, New Hampshire.
Ali Oshinskie for NHPR
/
NHPR
U.S. District Court in Concord, New Hampshire.

“The breadth of the anti-DEI laws’ prohibition is startling,” wrote Judge Landya B. McCafferty, with the U.S. District Court in Concord, New Hampshire. “The definition of ‘DEI’ contained [in the law] is so far-reaching that it prohibits long-accepted — even legally required — teaching and administrative practices.”

This story was originally produced by the Concord Monitor. NHPR is republishing it in partnership with the Granite State News Collaborative.

A federal judge on Thursday blocked a new statewide ban on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in public schools from taking effect, ruling that the law would prevent school districts from operating “at even a basic level.”

Judge Landya B. McCafferty found that the law, which was passed this year, would prohibit schools from splitting sports teams and bathrooms by sex, from determining whether students were old enough to begin kindergarten and from classifying students as having disabilities for the purpose of providing them with special education services.

“The breadth of the anti-DEI laws’ prohibition is startling,” McCafferty wrote. “The definition of ‘DEI’ contained [in the law] is so far-reaching that it prohibits long-accepted — even legally required — teaching and administrative practices.”

The decision is a setback for Republican leaders in the state, who made the elimination of DEI a central feature of their legislative agenda last session.

Sign up for the free Rundown newsletter for more NH news.

The law defined DEI as anything that classifies individuals on the basis of a protected characteristic for the purpose of “achieving demographic outcomes.” It had been designed to root out initiatives like implicit bias training, DEI assessments, and critical race theory.

The court order applies to the majority of – but not all – districts in the state. To be covered, the district must employ a member of the National Education Association, the largest educators’ union in the state, provide disability services to a member district or be one of the four school districts that joined the lawsuit directly.

The National Education Association represents educators in 133 of the 180 districts in the state, according to its website, including Concord, Merrimack Valley, Hopkinton and Bow.

The union served as one of eight plaintiffs in the case. It was joined by the Oyster River, Dover, Somersworth and Grantham school districts, as well as an advocacy organization and two individuals.

“This court victory could not come at a more critical time,” said Devon Chaffee, the executive director of the ACLU of New Hampshire, which brought the case. “Students across New Hampshire have the right to an inclusive education, and educators in our state should not be threatened with vague laws that restrict their ability to meet the needs of their students.”

McCafferty issued a preliminary injunction in the case, a more lasting ruling than previous restraining orders that had been issued. The case could still proceed to a trial.

A spokesperson for New Hampshire’s Department of Justice, which is defending against the challenge, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Related Content

You make NHPR possible.

NHPR is nonprofit and independent. We rely on readers like you to support the local, national, and international coverage on this website. Your support makes this news available to everyone.

Give today. A monthly donation of $5 makes a real difference.