WebHeader_Grove.png
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Support the news you rely on from NHPR and NPR with a gift today!
NH News

First in the nation no longer? Scrapping N.H. and Iowa's status possible for Democrats in 2024

A photo of a person approaching a table with voting booths in the background.
Sara Ernst
/
NHPR

The Democratic National Committee approved a resolution last week that will change the way the party chooses presidential candidates. States will now have to make a case for why they should be allowed to have contests at the first stage of the nominating calendar, and among that group of states is New Hampshire, which historically has the first-in-the-nation primary.

The DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee voted to make the change in an effort to focus on more diverse battleground states. As two mostly white states, New Hampshire and Iowa have been criticized for a lack of ability to represent the demographics of the entire country. New Hampshire’s Rules and Bylaws Committee representative Joanne Dowdell spoke with All Things Considered host Peter Biello about what this change means for New Hampshire’s primary position.

Here are some takeaways:

Does Dowdell think New Hampshire will keep its position at the top of the calendar?

Yes. She has “full confidence” New Hampshire will remain the first-in-the-nation primary.

Is New Hampshire racially diverse enough to make a case for itself to maintain its primary position?

Dowdell says yes, but when considering “diversity” it shouldn’t be limited to race and ethnicity. She says New Hampshire has economic and educational diversity, geographic diversity and “diverse points of view.”

Other states have challenged New Hampshire’s position before, but this is a national party trying to challenge the traditional order. Is this more of a threat to New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation status?

Dowdell says no. Under New Hampshire’s Title 63, state law requires elections to be held the second Tuesday in March, or seven days preceding the date which any other state holds a similar election, whichever comes first. With this codified, Dowdell says she believes “very strongly” that the Granite State will maintain its position.

If New Hampshire’s position is disrupted by the DNC, but it moves forward with an effort to keep its primary first, the DNC could bar delegates from New Hampshire at the party’s conventions. Would  Democrats in the state be willing to take that risk in exchange for the first spot? 

Dowdell says she doesn’t think that’s a question the state Democratic Party will have to contemplate.

You make NHPR possible.

NHPR is nonprofit and independent. We rely on readers like you to support the local, national, and international coverage on this website. Your support makes this news available to everyone.

Give today. A monthly donation of $5 makes a real difference.