Trump Team Killed Rule Designed To Protect Health Workers From Pandemic Like COVID-19 | New Hampshire Public Radio

Trump Team Killed Rule Designed To Protect Health Workers From Pandemic Like COVID-19

Originally published on May 26, 2020 8:19 pm

When President Trump took office in 2017, his team stopped work on new federal regulations that would have forced the health care industry to prepare for an airborne infectious disease pandemic such as COVID-19. That decision is documented in federal records reviewed by NPR.

"If that rule had gone into effect, then every hospital, every nursing home would essentially have to have a plan where they made sure they had enough respirators and they were prepared for this sort of pandemic," said David Michaels, who was head of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration until January 2017.

There are still no specific federal regulations protecting health care workers from deadly airborne pathogens such as influenza, tuberculosis or the coronavirus. This fact hit home during the last respiratory pandemic, the H1N1 outbreak in 2009. Thousands of Americans died and dozens of health care workers got sick. At least four nurses died.

Studies conducted after the H1N1 crisis found voluntary federal safety guidelines designed to limit the spread of airborne pathogens in medical facilities often weren't being followed. There were also shortages of personal protective equipment.

"H1N1 made it very clear OSHA did not have adequate standards for airborne transmission and contact transmission, and so we began writing a standard to do that," Michaels said.

HIV/AIDS rule set the standard for protecting workers

OSHA experts were confident new airborne infectious disease regulations would make hospitals and nursing homes safer when future pandemics hit. That's because similar rules had already been created for bloodborne pathogens such as Ebola and hepatitis.

Those rules, implemented during the HIV/AIDS epidemic, forced the health care industry to adopt safety plans and buy more equipment designed to protect staff and patients.

But making a new infectious disease regulation, affecting much of the American health care system, is time-consuming and contentious. It requires lengthy consultation with scientists, doctors and other state and federal regulatory agencies as well as the nursing home and hospital industries that would be forced to implement the standard.

Federal records reviewed by NPR show OSHA went step by step through that process for six years, and by early 2016 the new infectious disease rule was ready. The Obama White House formally added it to a list of regulations scheduled to be implemented in 2017.

Then came the presidential election.

An emphasis on deregulation

In the spring of 2017, the Trump team formally stripped OSHA's airborne infectious disease rule from the regulatory agenda. NPR could find no indication the new administration had specific policy concerns about the infectious disease rules.

Instead, the decision appeared to be part of a wider effort to cut regulations and bureaucratic oversight.

"Earlier this year we set a target of adding zero new regulatory costs onto the American economy," Trump said in December 2017. "As a result, the never-ending growth of red tape in America has come to a sudden, screeching and beautiful halt."

The impact on the federal effort to protect health care workers from diseases such as COVID-19 was immediate.

"The infectious disease standard was put on the back burner. Work stopped," said Michaels, now a professor at George Washington University.

A medical worker is assisted into personal protective equipment on May 8 before stepping into a patient's room in the COVID-19 intensive care unit at Harborview Medical Center in Seattle.
Elaine Thompson / AP

A deadly escalation of the H1N1 crisis

This spring, hospitals and nursing homes found themselves facing much of the same crisis they experienced during the H1N1 outbreak, with many facilities unprepared and unequipped. Only this time the scale was larger and deadlier.

The federal government reports that at least 43,000 front-line health care workers have gotten sick, many infected, while caring for COVID-19 patients in facilities where personal protective equipment was being rationed.

"Even just a few months ago, I couldn't have imagined that I would have been on a Zoom call reading out the names of registered nurses who have died on the front lines of a pandemic," said Bonnie Castillo, who heads the National Nurses United union.

"The memorial was not only about grief. It was also about anger."

OSHA's infectious disease rule debated in Washington

Castillo said Congress should immediately implement the infectious disease regulations shelved by the Trump administration as an emergency rule before a second wave of the coronavirus hits.

"Which obviously would mandate that employers have the highest level of PPE, not the lowest," she said.

Democrats in the House of Representatives passed a bill in mid-May that would do so, but the Republican-controlled Senate has blocked the measure, and the White House still opposes the rules.

The Trump administration hasn't responded to NPR's repeated inquiries about the infectious disease rule. But in a briefing call with lawmakers this month, the current head of OSHA, Loren Sweatt, argued enough rules are already in place to protect workers.

"We have mandatory standards related to personal protective equipment and bloodborne pathogens and sanitation standards," Sweatt said in a recording provided to NPR. "We have existing standards that can address this area."

The hospital industry also opposes the new safety rules. Nancy Foster with the American Hospital Association said voluntary guidelines for airborne pandemics are adequate.

"You're right; they're not regulations, but they are the guidance that we want to follow," Foster said. "They set forth the expectation for infection control, so in a sense they're just like regulations."

But the infectious disease standard would have required the health care industry to do far more. It sets out specific standards for planning and training. It would also have forced facilities to stockpile personal protective equipment to handle "surges" of sick patients such as the ones seen with COVID-19.

NPR also found the lack of fixed regulations allowed the Trump administration to relax worker safety guidelines. Federal agencies did so repeatedly this spring as COVID-19 spread and shortages of personal protective equipment worsened.

As a consequence, hospitals could say they were meeting federal guidelines while requiring doctors and nurses to reuse masks and protective gowns after exposure to sick patients.

Clarification: 5/26/20

An earlier version of this story reported that David Michaels was at OSHA when the Trump administration shelved infectious disease regulations. Michaels had departed by the time that decision was made.

Copyright 2020 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

When President Trump took office, his team killed new regulations that would have forced hospitals and nursing homes to prepare for a pandemic like COVID-19. Critics say that decision left health care workers dangerously vulnerable. Tens of thousands of nurses and other care providers have gotten sick. There's a push now for the federal safety rules to be implemented, but the Trump administration is still opposed. NPR's Brian Mann reports.

BRIAN MANN, BYLINE: The federal government has safety rules covering all kinds of workplace hazards, but there are no specific regulations protecting health care workers from deadly airborne pathogens like influenza, tuberculosis or COVID-19. This fact hit home during the last respiratory pandemic.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: ...Quadrupled its estimated H1N1 flu virus death toll to roughly 3,900.

MANN: As H1N1 spread in 2009, federal officials found many hospitals unprepared. Studies found voluntary safety guidelines weren't being followed. There were shortages of personal protective equipment, dozens of health care workers got sick, and at least four nurses died. At the time, David Michaels was head of OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

DAVID MICHAELS: H1N1 made it very clear that OSHA did not have adequate standards for airborne transmission.

MANN: The proposed rules were based on federal regulations for bloodborne diseases created during the HIV/AIDS epidemic that forced hospitals to improve training and safety equipment. Making a new infectious disease standard for respiratory ailments affecting much of the health care industry was time-consuming and complex. Federal records reviewed by NPR show OSHA went step by step through the process for six years. And by early 2016, the new infectious disease rule was ready. The Obama White House added it to a list of regulations scheduled to be implemented in 2017. Then came the presidential election.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: Earlier this year, we set a target of adding zero new regulatory costs onto the American economy.

MANN: President Trump, speaking here in 2017, made deregulation a big part of his economic agenda. Federal records show Trump's team stripped the airborne infectious disease rule from the agenda two years before COVID-19 hit. Again, David Michaels, the former director of OSHA.

MICHAELS: If the rule had gone into effect, then every hospital, every nursing home would essentially have to have a plan where they made sure to have enough respirators and that they were prepared for this sort of pandemic.

MANN: Instead, hospitals and nursing homes found themselves again without enough protective equipment, only this time on a larger, deadlier scale. Bonnie Castillo heads a union called National Nurses United.

BONNIE CASTILLO: Even just a few months ago, I couldn't have imagined that I would have been on a Zoom call reading out the names of registered nurses who have died on the front lines of a pandemic.

MANN: At least 43,000 nurses, doctors and other frontline medical workers have gotten sick, many of them infected while caring for patients in facilities where personal protective equipment, or PPE, was being rationed. Castillo says the regulations shelved by the Trump administration should be implemented now by Congress as an emergency rule before a second wave of COVID-19 hits.

CASTILLO: Which obviously would mandate that employers have the highest level of PPE, not the lowest.

MANN: Democrats in the House passed a bill in mid-May that would do that, but the measure has so far been blocked by the Republican-controlled Senate. And the rules are still opposed by the White House. The Trump administration hasn't responded to NPR's inquiries. In a briefing call with lawmakers earlier this month, the current head of OSHA, Loren Sweatt, argued there are already enough rules protecting workers. A recording of the call was provided to NPR.

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)

LOREN SWEATT: Well, we have mandatory standards related to personal protective equipment and bloodborne pathogens, sanitation standards. We have existing standards that can address this area.

MANN: Hospitals also oppose the new safety rules. Nancy Foster with the American Hospital Association says voluntary guidelines are adequate.

NANCY FOSTER: They're not regulations, but they are the guidance that we want to follow. They set forth the expectation for infection control. So in a sense, they are just like regulation.

MANN: But the airborne infectious disease standard would have required the health care industry to do far more, stockpiling personal protective equipment to handle surges of sick patients. NPR also found the lack of fixed regulations allowed the Trump administration to relax worker safety guidelines as COVID-19 spread. That meant hospitals could say they were meeting federal guidelines while requiring workers to reuse masks and protective gowns after they'd been exposed to sick patients.

Brian Mann, NPR News. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.