Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations
Become a sustaining member and you could win a trip to Barbados!
Final results: Summary results | Town resultsThe BasicsThe New Hampshire primary is a mainstay in American electoral politics. Every four years, voters gather to help determine the Republican and/or Democratic nominee for President. While the state only has 12 electoral votes in 2012 (normally it’s 24, but the Republican National Committee penalized the state party for moving up the event date), the primary’s position as one of the earliest contests gives the state out-sized influence over the nomination process.Only the Iowa caucuses come before New Hampshire’s primary. Traditionally, New Hampshire’s broad-based primary contest has been seen as a counter-weight to Iowa’s more drawn-out caucus process, which tends to draw a smaller core of party faithful. In the case of the 2012 Republican race, New Hampshire’s electorate is seen to represent the more libertarian-leaning, fiscally conservative wing of the party, while Iowa voters are seen as representing the socially conservative wing of the GOP base.N.H. Primary summary provided by StateImpact - NH reporter, Amanda Loder

Medicaid Expansion Divides Candidates in Governor's Race

Ben McLeod
Flickr Creative Commons

When the Supreme Court ruled on the Affordable Care Act, it said states must be given a choice about expanding their Medicaid programs.

Option A: Keep things as they are.

Option B: Enroll more people, and the Federal government will help you pay for their care.

Democrat Jackie Cilley likes that second option. She says that if New Hampshire doesn’t grow its Medicaid rolls, poor people will continue to slip through the cracks, and that Republican lawmakers in Concord would bear the blame.

"If you have watched what’s gone on in our legislature in the last two years, they have attempted in every way possible to walk away from those most vulnerable," says Cilley.

Her rival in tomorrow’s primary, Maggie Hassan, also likes Option B.

"I am committed to using federal money to expand health care coverage for the people in our state," says Hassan. "But we need to do it in a way that is right for New Hampshire."

The former state senator says an expansion makes good economic sense, but she’s cautious. Hassan wants to see more Federal money for the program.

Medicaid already costs the state about $700 million annually. That’s 26 % of the budget.

Republican candidate Kevin Smith says the state just can’t afford to spend more on the program.

"One of the things I’ve said is that I would oppose the expansion of Medicaid, and not because it’s an ideological position but because there is no way for the state to pay for it."

The Federal government will cover the tab for expanded coverage through 2017. By 2020, states will have to shoulder 10% of the costs.

Smith argues that even with a seemingly good deal on the table for states, their partner down in D.C. doesn’t have a good track record with this sort of thing.

"The Federal government can’t even meet its obligation for fully funding special ed for the last 30 years," says Smith. "On top of that, they’ve racked up a $15 trillion debt. And now they are telling us that they are going to pay for every state’s Medicaid expansion? I’m not buying it."

Ovide Lamontagne is Smith’s main opponent for the Republican nomination. He agrees on this issue.

"I think most people in New Hampshire understand we are better suited if the policy makers in New Hampshire chart a new course for health care reform. Not the people in Washington who have a very different view than we do about what’s good for us."

Negative reaction to the Affordable Care Act helped usher many republicans into office in 2010. But two years later, it’s a different atmosphere.

"Top three issues in this election are jobs, jobs and jobs," says Wayne Lesperance, professor of Political Science at New England College

Lesperance notes that the candidates, and the voters, don’t seem all that interested in the complicated world of health policy.

Frank McDougall of Dartmouth-Hitchcock lives in that world.  D-H is the state’s largest provider of services for Medicaid patients, and supports the expansion. He agrees that pocketbook issues should be the focus.

"One of the best things for health care is a job," says McDougall. "And there are all kinds of statistics that show that. So helping the economy rebound and getting people as close to full employment as we can is very much aligned with the goals of Dartmouth-Hitchcock."

Of course, a huge government program like Medicaid does directly impact New Hampshire’s economy. Expanded care will require expanded state spending, which has to be paid for somehow.

But less coverage could mean more people using the emergency room, meaning higher premiums for everyone else.

It’s a choice New Hampshire will eventually have to make. That process starts with tomorrow’s primary.

Todd started as a news correspondent with NHPR in 2009. He spent nearly a decade in the non-profit world, working with international development agencies and anti-poverty groups. He holds a master’s degree in public administration from Columbia University.
Related Content

You make NHPR possible.

NHPR is nonprofit and independent. We rely on readers like you to support the local, national, and international coverage on this website. Your support makes this news available to everyone.

Give today. A monthly donation of $5 makes a real difference.