|
||||||
|
|
|
Teens Discuss Parental Notification
By Dan Gorenstein on Tuesday, November 29, 2005.
Tomorrow the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments over the state's parental notification law. Lawyers, activists and politicians will all discuss the merits of the law that requires a parent or guardian to be notified 48 hours before a girl under 18 can receive an abortion. But the arguments heard in Washington tomorrow can't include the voices of those on the front lines- teenagers. New Hampshire Public Radio's Dan Gorenstein spoke with a dozen students about parental notification Monday. Sfx: hallway sound Souhegan High Souhegan High School is in Amherst, New Hampshire- just a few miles from Nashua. 14-year old student Ashley says ideally a child would talk to a parent about pregnancy and abortion. But something like pregnancy, she says, can be just too personal. T.12 Classmate Mark is sympathetic. He believes a lot of times parents don't really know their kids. And he thinks parental notification could damage the image parents have of their child. T.10 Mark points out that someone doesn't have to be a parent. The state's parental notification law does allow for a so-called judicial by-pass. That is a process in which a girl could make a case to a judge why her parent shouldn't be informed. Of the six teenage girls interviewed, all personally opposed the concept of parental notification. And like Ali that resistance was due at least in part to a fear of disappointing their parents. CUT: Kelly2 That's New Hampshire Administrative Judge Edwin Kelly. If parental notification becomes law, Kelly would be responsible for prepping the state's judges to hear judicial by-pass cases. He also is eligible to hear those cases himself. Kelly Kelly says he expects judges would ask about the individual's life experiences, whether she was in school, if she held a job. If the judge determined the young woman lacked the maturity to terminate the pregnancy on her own, the judge would asses the girl's life to gauge the value of avoiding parental notification. But if 'just because I don't want to tell my parents,' isn't a sufficient answer, Manchester 15-year old Cindy worries how that would affect other teenagers. T.27 Concord 17-year old Ashley doesn't agree. She believes parental notification would scare kids into abstinence or at least into having safe sex. Ashley is mixed overall on parental notification. She doesn't believe girls should be forced to tell their parents, but at the same time she wishes her friend had. T.16 T.17 T.17 Manchester teen Cindy has a story of a classmate who did tell her parents about her pregnancy. T.28 T.28 T.28 Those stories may be real or they may be the kind of tales that teenagers pass among themselves. But each reveals a worst case scenario that advocates from both sides of the debate fear. The common ground 17-year old Ashley and 15-year old Cindy agree on is that not enough parents bother to talk with their children about sex and abortion. James Steiner, father to a 14 year old girl, says that's not as easy as it sounds. T.22 Steiner supports parental notification. He says he doesn't think the law would force his daughters to talk to him. He believes they would on their own. But 17-year old Ashley doesn't think that's the best way to handle the situation. T.18 The US Supreme Court begins oral arguments in AYotte Vs. Planned Parenhood Wednesday at 11 am. A decision in the case is not expected until spring. For NHPR News, I'm DG. Post a comment
Links: |
Support FromHighlights | ||