|
||||||
|
|
|
Divorced Fathers Press for Greater Custody Rights
By David Darman on Thursday, March 17, 2005.
The House Children and Family Law Committee today heard testimony on a bill that would give greater consideration to the custodial rights of divorced fathers. New Hampshire Public Radio's David Darman has more. About 75 people crammed a legislative hearing room to discuss the bill that would make changes to state child custody laws. Representative Dave Bickford of New Durham is sponsoring the measure. He says he crafted it because fathers have parental rights and responsibilities in marriage, and that shouldn't end with divorce. Bickford's bill would require the courts to give each parent equal custodial rights. That 50-50 notion was popular with many men in the audience. One who testified was David Amico, a divorced father of two small children. He says his divorce decree has drastically reduced his time with his kids. Opponents of Bickford's bill called it wrong headed. Their problem centers on the measure's instruction to the court that every divorce involving children should start with the presumption that both parents should get equal custodial time. Nina Gardner is the chairwoman of New Hampshire's Family Law Task Force. Other critics of the Bickford bill said they agreed with the sponsor that many divorced fathers should have greater say over their children's lives. John Cameron is a Laconia attorney who has a family law practice. He says despite his agreement, the bill has a flaw that is present in much of the state's family law system. And he says many attorneys, parents, and even judges share that flaw. Cameron says they all focus too much on parents, and not enough on children. Many people who wanted to testify at the hearing didn't get the chance, because time ran out. The committee has announced it will continue the hearing next Tuesday. comments
All comments are moderated before appearing on the site. Comments must adhere to the NHPR.org comment guidelines and terms of use. |
Support FromHighlights |
the mother of 14 yrs 4 kids has up and left for 4 months now for some other guy now that she found out i was applying for custody she ran down and applied against me she has a brother that has a pending assault and battery charge against him that is living with her and my daughter may have been involved with a attempted kidbnapping that she never reported to the police i have the children in my 3 bdrm 1 acre home and i have provided for them for the 12 yrs of there lives and the youngest was 8 months old when she left her apartment has lead paint on the outside and its located on a busy road what can i do.will i get them
I am a single father and presently going through the custody battle myself. I recently found out that my sons mother is engaged to be married to a convicted sex offender. So I pushed for full custody. The first hearing was Tuesday and the Judge stated that she would have to have UA's every so often due to her alleged drug use and angermangement analysis. But the Judge also is still letting her fiance the convicted sex offender still have contact with my son as long as she is my sons presence at that time. I am sorry but doesn't that seem as if my son has no rights. It is not his choice to have opinions of a convicted sex offender put in his head. Where are the rights for my son. His mother also has two other children from two other fathers that have nothing to do with their kids becasue she pushed them out of their kids lives. Who is there to speak in their behalf. Does anyone feel that a convicted Sex offender should have more rights than the childs father. Do I not have a say in the influences that my son is subjected to? Because if she wins even a partial custody then the sex offender will have more rights than my son. Is that fair?
I feel that the fathers rights should be more prevelant so more father's stand up for there children. Most fathers have a vested interest in the childs welfare. It is just unfortunate that some of us have more interests than others.
Thanks,
Greg Olsen
Helena, MT
Merlin, It sounds like you have a good case. I know that short of the judge hearing the cases as Parent A and Parent B, there will always be bias in the system. However, it is my sincere hope that this bill would go a long way on trying to balance the scales for the father.