Iowa Caucus Wrap Up

Laura Knoy's picture
By Laura Knoy on Friday, January 4, 2008.
listen: Listen with Windows Media PlayerListen with an MP3 Player

We'll wrap up the results of the Iowa Caucus, who did well, who didn't and any surprises and then look ahead to the three days between Iowa and the New Hampshire Primary and see how the campaigns are spending their time, fresh off their Iowa showing.

Guests

  • Ken Rudin, Political Director for National Public Radio and author of the Political Junkie column on NPR.org
  • Wayne Lesperance, Associate Professor of Political Science and Director of the Center for Civic Engagement at New England College

We'll Also Hear From

  • Dennis J. Goldford, Professor for the Department of Politics and International Relations at Drake University in Iowa

Web resources:

Related news:

Friday, June 27, 2008
Obama and Clinton Campaign in Unity

Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Union in Unity

Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Former Congressman Jeb Bradley is Running Again, But So Is John Stephen

Related shows:

Monday, July 7, 2008
Next Green Thing: Comparing the Candidates

Monday, July 7, 2008
Betting on the Veepstakes

Tuesday, June 24, 2008
The Granite State Debate Over Campaign Finance

Now that Senator Obama has

Now that Senator Obama has won in Iowa, with the next highest vote getters a white male and a woman, please ask your guests to comment on the argument that Iowa and NH should not be the first caucus/primary venues because they are too white and too small to be "representative" of the nation. Senator Obama and at least one of the other two tier candidates from Iowa will retain their top tier status in NH. The political cultures in NH and Iowa are not identical, but they share these important characteristics: the practice of careful scrutiny of candidates' platforms, records, and, in Dr. King's words, the content of their characters. Learning to do this and acting on it doesn't happen overnight. It requires continuous attention, not sporadic interest stirred by up by an impending election or the desire for national publicity. Going first is a privilege but above all, it is a responsibility. The results from Iowa show that Iowans measure up to that responsibility; the results from NH will demonstrate that like Iowans, primary voters in the Granite State vote as citizens of the United States and that we take our responsibility very seriously. Jan Alberghene

Forty years ago in 1967 Carl

Forty years ago in 1967 Carl B. Stokes was elected the first black Mayor of a major American City. I was the operations manager of that campaign along with my partner Geraldine Willliams. In 1965, Stokes had run and almost won in a city that was 70% white and 30% black. In 1965 he had come so close to winning that there was a recount. His victory in 67 was hailed as one the greatest moments in the civil rights struggle and also a triumph of the brotherhood of man. Partially, yes----partially, no. In the 1965 campaign there were practically no white votes for Stokes. In 67 there was only 15%. Not exactly a triumph for the brotherhood of man. In fact, in 1965 I was his "white" aide and traveling companion to show not only the white community, but just as importantly the black community that he had white support. Many in the black community said "it's not time"---he's not ready---will he win and bring disgrace to the community---will he be killed by the racists" Do these same sentiments sound familiar in 2007?

Also, in 1965 he was up against a potent political machine, one that regularly "bought off" members of the black community. There were city councilman and black pastors all of whom had ties to the white establishment. Sound familiar in 2007? In both 1965 and 1967 it was the black community that turned out in large numbers and then voted 97% for Stokes. He still lost in 1965 because some of the black vote was disaffected by the councilman and pastors but it was so close that in 1967 and with the blessing of the establishment he won----but by a very small margin. Again, it was the black turnout and overwhelming percentage vote in his favor that carried the day.

How does Barack Obama's campaign of 2007 differ from those two campaigns of long ago? He is running against the establishment (the Clinton machine) and there are black "leaders" that are staying with this establishment. Polls are showing that many in the black community are saying the same things that they said in 1965-----it's not time---he's not ready---he will be killed if he is elected. Are these sentiments carried down through time going to defeat him in 2007? Here is the reason that the campaigns are not alike. The white support for Obama is huge compared to the white support for Stokes forty years ago. Who would have dreamed then that a black man running for the President of the United States could garner such white support, attract such crowds, and be so close to winning. I see campaign crowds I see a sea of white faces cheering him and I see a much different time than that of 1965 & 1967.

Following is an example from the 1965 campaign. It shows how extraordinary the idea of a black mayor (there are now hundreds) was to the black community at that time. The last weekend before the election we had a parade through the streets of the East Side of Cleveland. It wasn't much of a parade, as parades go, a handful of cars with balloons and banners on the them, horns honking, people waving, and Carl and is wife sitting on the back of the last car. I was in the front seat As the caravan pulled past the corner, there was a small boy about ten or eleven standing in the middle of a group of children. The cars had been going past honking with signs "Stokes for Mayor" on the sides. As the car with Stokes sitting on the back came to the corner the boy stood, his eyes widened at the sight of Carl and he cried out, "HE'S COLORED." He started to clap his hands and jump up and down. "HE'S COLORED, HE'S COLORED," he cried out to no one in particular. "HE'S COLORED, HE'S COLORED" and he started to skip down the street after the car. I looked back as the cars picked up speed and left the little boy in the distance. He was still running and clapping his hands. I turned around to Carl and caught a very different expression on his face, part smile and part a distant look in his eyes. "I think it's all been worthwhile," I said. A quick but soft-spoken reply, "Yes, I think you're right." That's how it was back then. A little boy thought, "this couldn't be-----his parents and grandparents thought---could this possibly be? And a city and a nation wondered if history was in the making.

I sometimes wonder where that little boy is now, forty years later. What about his children and grandchildren? Does he remember how he felt that day? Does he remember the wonderment of seeing a black man siting on the top of a convertible, his skipping down the street in that wonderment of a black man striving for the impossible? How do his children and grandchildren feel today? Will they participate in today's "impossible dream"?

Now, forty years later I see the crowds, more white than black, cheering a man of color. Now, forty years later, I see polls showing that this man of color could likely be the next President of the United States. I see now, forty years later, that dreams do come true-------and a little boy of so long ago could still clap, skip down the street and cry out----"He's colored-He's colored---- he's colored. Will the black community support Obama as we Irish Catholics did for John Kennedy in 1960, as the Momons will do for Mitt Romney this year, as every ethnic group has done for their history making candidates since the country began. It is the black vote that can insure victory for Barack Obama. This is the year. This is the time. This is history in the making.

The face of The United States of America is about to change.

Article Source:
B. Kenneth McGee, Author
Eyes Shut Tight

The last picture we saw of

The last picture we saw of Obama he was listening to the National Anthem, all candidates had there hands on there hearts, Except Obama. His hands were folded in front, he was sloughed, and had the look of : Oh God please finish this so junk,

As a woman, I was surprised

As a woman, I was surprised that more women did not support Clinton. Maybe people don't want to rehash the Clinton (good and bad) history again.

Young voters and women came out for Obama and Edwards. People want inspiration and change!!! I watched CSPAN and overheard comments from the Iowa voters making statements about our place in the world stage and that Obama would best represent us.

Experience was dismissed (Biden).... Money didn't matter (Romney, Clinton). Clinton has not convinced people that she does represent change from the old guard.

Professor: you have

Professor: you have listened to all candidates I presume? Which one would do the most for Americans, Which ones of All the candidates would do the best for Our ecomony etc? I don't believe taxing the rich helps middle class, they are the ones who Really Invest in America and really assist in keeping american jobs.

I don't really see this

I don't really see this primary as very valid, I have heard that in New Hampshire , no ID or voter Registeration is required to vote, all you need is a utility bill with your name on it. I wonder just how many votes will be bought and paid for by candidates, especailly if the person is illegal and really has no right to vote. So New Hampshire to the rest of us, is totally Irrevelant.

NPR News