Kucinch Takes on a New Cause -- The Constitution

By Jon Greenberg on Wednesday, November 28, 2007.

Dennis Kucinich, the Democratic Ohio congressman running for president, is best known for his single-payer health care plan. But this month, he has taken on an additional cause. Kucinich says the concentration of power in the oval office has put the nation at risk. Speaking in Exeter last night, he said citizens must come together to protect the constitution. New Hampshire Public Radio’s Jon Greenberg has this installment in our Primary Place series.

About a hundred people listened to Congressman Kucinich in the assembly hall on the campus of the Phillips Exeter Academy. It was largely a receptive crowd and when Exeter resident Bill Hennessy raised the issue of President Bush’s extensive use of signing statements, Kucinich was right there with him.

CUT do you agree with me that these signing statements are a direct assault on the constitution?// Yes.

Signing statements are the opinions the president attaches to a bill when he signs it. President Bush has used them more than any other president, in many cases to say he interprets the new law in such a way that suggests he does not feel bound by it. For Kucinich, this practice and the lead up to the Iraq War are grounds for impeachment, a remedy he is already pursuing against the vice-president.

Kucinich says the country has drifted towards monarchy and hence, his latest campaign.

CUT the constitution requires three branches of government. The congress’s failure to challenge the president essentially wipes out the legislative branch. It makes the legislative branch worse than a rubber stamp but a docile slavish adherent to administrative force.

Kucinich now holds regular conferences on the constitution aimed at stirring a grassroots movement to pressure congress to, in his view, stand up for its own interests.

The congressman still talks extensively about a single-payer health care system. He says the savings in administrative overhead and eliminating the profits of insurance companies would go a long way toward paying for it – and some government studies do say there would be overall savings. But while he sees a much larger role for government in health care, Kucinich has added a new dimension – the importance of personal responsibility.

CUT We need to create a health consciousness in this country that has to do with the choices that we make and the things we put into our bodies. We don’t have total control but we do have some control.

Kucinich says he is writing a bill that will encourage more individual initiative to stay healthy. His views on another dimension of private life emerged during a discussion of drug costs. A man in the audience told how his wife was just diagnosed with Hodgkins Lymphoma. Her prescribed treatment includes one particular drug.

CUT The cost of one shot is 10,000 dollars. Now that’s obscene to me.

Kucinich took this as an example of the tension between private enterprise and the common good.

CUT I’m not opposed to people making money. It’s a fine American way. However, if you’re making it on health care, there’s got to be a limit on what people can be expected to pay.”

Kucinich was asked in several ways, how he would pay for his various proposals, whether they were to rebuild the country’s infrastructure or spur development of energy sources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. He said he takes a different approach to government spending. Instead of borrowing money, the government should just print more and deal with the inflationary effects through taxes.

CUT to take profits out of the system

These views are hardly in vogue in America. But Kucinich told his listeners, if they like his ideas, there is something they can do.

CUT help us

For NHPR News, I’m Jon Greenberg.

Comments (1)
Article Tools
Email
Print

Public Insight
comments

All comments are moderated before appearing on the site. Comments must adhere to the NHPR.org comment guidelines and terms of use.

Kucinich and the

Kucinich and the Constitution are like Oil and Water -- He must trust explicitly that people will not research his "actual" voting record.

One day people will wake up, stop watching the scripted debates and study each candidate to see if they keep their oath of office, they "swear" to uphold the Constitution -- this means their voting cannot deviate from this. Nothing else is important, in the big scheme of things -- If they don't keep their word (oath) than we boot them out, simple!

Kucinich voted against this war (bravo - so, did Ron Paul) he also voted against Patriot Act (bravo - so, did Ron Paul).

However, Kucinich voted for every bit of military expansionism after that: Most of the money spent on "Military Construction" went over seas to aid in American Military Colonialism (760 Bases in 130 Countries).

From 2002 to now he voted in favor of all 'Military Construction" Ron Paul voted against every single bill.

From 2002 to 2007 Kucinich voted for every Homeland Security Bill - Ron Paul voted all of them down.

Kucinich voted in favor of most of Bill Clinton's World Policing Schemas - Ron Paul voted everyone of them down!

Kucinich (and almost every candidate running) voted down National Security - Ron Paul was the only one in favor of it!! Imagine that, but you know it is very telling. The only role Congress has, militarily, is to protect THIS nation -- so, in voting down Nation Security, they show their anti-constitutional tendencies!

Republicans and Democrats on both sides of the ilse agree that Ron Paul is a Constitutionalist and in 30 years has never changed this trend.

Kucinich also voted in favor of the '97 Juvenile Crime Bill - this Bill lowered the age a minor could be tried as an adult for non-violent drug charges - Ron Paul voted this down stating, "we need to treat people with addictions medically and not criminally," how Einsteining, how Ghandian -- I don't think Martin Luther King Jr would have "criminalized" drug addicts - then again he was a Republican.

Peace,

Octobox