The Lavender Vote

Laura Knoy's picture
By Laura Knoy on Wednesday, August 15, 2007.
listen: Listen with Windows Media PlayerListen with an MP3 Player

In the 2004 Presidential election it was said that most Democrats stayed as far away from the political issues of gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered as they could, while Republicans used the idea of gay marriage as a wedge issue to further divide the party. Four years later, much has changed. Last week all but two of the major Democratic candidates for President attended the first ever televised “Gay Debate” in Los Angeles while the Republican candidates unanimously declined to attend a gay debate of their own. It not only shows the growing rift between Democrats and Republicans over gay issues but also how the “lavender vote” may be, for some candidates, more important to woo than ever. We’ll explore how and why this election is different and what the big issues on the gay agenda are, including hate crimes, same-sex marriage and the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

Guests

  • Dean Spilliotes: New Hampshire-based political analyst, formerly with the NH Institute of Politics at St. Anselm College. He's launching NHPoliticalCapital.com in September, where he’ll be doing full-time political blogging, commentary and analysis
  • Joe Solmonese: president of the Human Rights Campaign, a civil rights organization in Washington, D.C. advocating for GLBT issues and sponsor of the Democratic Presidential Debate on gay issues that happened last week in Los Angeles.
  • Patrick Sammon: President of the National Log Cabin Republicans, The nation's largest organization of Republicans advocating for fairness, freedom, and equality for gay and lesbian Americans.

Web resources:

Related news:

Wednesday, July 23, 2008
McCain Returns, Criticizes Obama on Iraq

Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Republicans Square Off in CD1 Debate in Manchester

Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Some Dems Still Say No To Obama

Related shows:

Thursday, July 10, 2008
Open Source Reality

Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Sex in Crisis

Monday, July 7, 2008
Next Green Thing: Comparing the Candidates

The civil-religious conflict

The civil-religious conflict is bogus.

Marriage is a civil institution, and religious institutions place their own limitations on it. Some churches don't allow divorce, others marriage to non-members, etc.

There is supposed to be a wall of separation between church and state, and here lies the beauty of the Constitution:

The Federal Govt shouldn't mandate a church's participation in gay marriage; the church should not mandate blanket discrimination against it.

Hopefully New Hampshire

Hopefully New Hampshire Public Radio listeners will realize that gay voters are more intelligent than the HRC President Joe Salmonese said they were. Salmonese said that many gays choose candidates on many other issues besides how they stand on gay issues. He then went on to say that gays would want to vote for Hillary Clinton so that we could have the first woman president, or vote for Barack Obama to vote for the first black president. This is nonsense. Gays tend to vote for candidates because of the same issues anyone else does. When candidates are perceived to be hostile to gays, then gays will vote against that candidate.

NPR News